CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

django-migrations

Django migration patterns and safety workflow for PostHog. Use when creating, adjusting, or reviewing Django/Postgres migrations, including non-blocking index/constraint changes, multi-phase schema changes, data backfills, migration conflict rebasing, and product model moves that require SeparateDatabaseAndState. Also use for any deletion or removal of a model, table, column, product, or app — including deleting migration files or retiring a feature — even when no migration is written.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Django migrations

Read these files first, before writing or editing a migration:

  • docs/published/handbook/engineering/developing-locally.md (## Django migrations, ### Non-blocking migrations, ### Resolving merge conflicts)
  • docs/published/handbook/engineering/safe-django-migrations.md
  • docs/published/handbook/engineering/databases/schema-changes.md
  • products/README.md (## Adding or moving backend models and migrations) when working in products/*

If the task is a ClickHouse migration, use clickhouse-migrations instead.

Never delete a migration file

Adding migrations is fine. Deleting a historical one — any */migrations/NNNN_*.py already on master, even an app's 0001_initial.py, even to "undo" a schema change — is not. Deleting the file undoes nothing: the table and its constraints stay in every database where the migration ran, fresh databases never recreate them, and the "Migration Risk Analysis" CI job re-flags the file as a phantom new migration on every open PR that predates the deletion. The deleted-migration check in the repo-checks CI job (the hogli lint:migration-deletions command) blocks this. Genuinely intentional, reviewed deletions — a product/app move, a revert, a squash — are acknowledged in .github/scripts/migration-deletion-allowlist.txt, never by disabling the guard.

If a task asks you to delete a migration file, stop and flag it instead.

To retire a model/table:

  1. Remove all usage and the model class. makemigrations, then wrap the generated DeleteModel in migrations.SeparateDatabaseAndState(state_operations=[...]) (state only, no DB change). KEEP this file. Keep the app in INSTALLED_APPS.
  2. Deploy, wait at least one full deploy cycle.
  3. Optionally DROP TABLE later in a NEW RunSQL migration — never by deleting old files.

Full guide: safe-django-migrations.md (## Dropping Tables, ### Removing a whole product or app). Deleting a migration your branch added but never merged to master is allowed (regenerating).

Workflow

  1. Classify the change as additive (new nullable column, new table) or risky (drop/rename, NOT NULL, indexes, constraints, large data updates, model moves). A change is also risky if it touches a hot table, regardless of how additive it looks. See also the cross-language NOT NULL hazard below.
  2. Generate: DEBUG=1 ./manage.py makemigrations [app_label]. For merge conflicts: python manage.py rebase_migration <app> && git add <app>/migrations (posthog or ee).
  3. Apply safety rules from safe-django-migrations.md — the doc covers multi-phase rollouts, SeparateDatabaseAndState, concurrent operations, idempotency, and all risky patterns in detail.
  4. Validate: ./manage.py sqlmigrate <app> <migration_number>, run tests, confirm linear migration sequence.

Use the migration helpers

posthog.migration_helpers has drop-in operations for the risky-but-common cases. Reach for these first; they track Django state, disable timeouts, and are idempotent under bin/migrate retries:

  • Add/drop an indexSafeAddIndexConcurrently / SafeRemoveIndexConcurrently (model_name + models.Index). Never use Django's AddIndexConcurrently — CI blocks it.
  • Add a CHECK constraintAddConstraintNotValid then ValidateConstraint in a later migration (or same migration with atomic = False).
  • Add a ForeignKey to a hot table → declare the FK with db_constraint=False on the model (so CreateModel / AddField emit no parent lock), then add the DB constraint back with AddForeignKeyNotValid and follow up with ValidateForeignKey in a later migration. See foreign keys to hot tables.
  • Index expressed only as raw SQL (no Django Index) → CreateIndexConcurrently / DropIndexConcurrently wrapped in SeparateDatabaseAndState.

All concurrent-index ops require atomic = False.

Meta-principle when you hit a risky-but-common pattern with no helper: don't hand-roll the safe DDL from docs — ship a drop-in helper in posthog/migration_helpers and point the CI policy at it. A one-import helper beats a wall of caveated RunSQL every time.

Hot table hazard

posthog_team, posthog_user, posthog_organization, and posthog_project are read on virtually every request. Any ALTER TABLE on them — including a plain nullable AddField, which is "safe" everywhere else — needs an ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock, and while that lock request waits behind in-flight queries, every later query on the table queues behind it. Even a metadata-only ADD COLUMN can stall site-wide traffic in waves (one per bin/migrate retry) until the ALTER wins the lock race. This has caused production 5xx incidents.

Before writing a migration that touches one of these models:

  • For Team: put domain-specific fields on a Team extension model instead — posthog/models/team/README.md. That's a CREATE TABLE, no lock on posthog_team.
  • CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY (via SafeAddIndexConcurrently) is fine — SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE doesn't block reads or writes.
  • If the field genuinely belongs on the hot table (core identity, cross-product settings, SDK config), the HotTableAlterPolicy analyzer blocks the migration in CI until <app_label>.<migration_name> is added to posthog/management/migration_analysis/hot_table_acknowledged_migrations.txt. That acknowledgment also means coordinating the deploy with infra for a low-traffic window.

Foreign keys to hot tables

A ForeignKey targeting a hot table is the same hazard from the other side, and it bites from any app — a plain product-app CreateModel or AddField with to="posthog.team" (or settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL, which is posthog_user). Creating the FK constraint takes a SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE lock on the referenced parent, which conflicts with the ROW EXCLUSIVE every INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on the parent holds; under write traffic the lock queues and lock_timeout cancels it on each bin/migrate retry. HotTableAlterPolicy now flags this case. Two ways out:

  • db_constraint=False on the ForeignKey — emits no FK constraint and takes no lock on the parent at all (app-level enforcement only). This is the only truly lock-free path.
  • A real DB constraint, two-phase — declare the FK db_constraint=False, then add it back as a DB constraint with AddForeignKeyNotValid, and ValidateForeignKey in a later migration. Be honest: ADD CONSTRAINT ... NOT VALID still takes a brief SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE lock on the parent for the metadata add — it skips the row scan, so it shrinks the lock window but does not eliminate it. VALIDATE then runs lock-free on the parent.

Cross-language NOT NULL hazard

posthog_user, posthog_team, and other core tables in the main Postgres database are written by Django and by nodejs/ (plugin-server tests via insertRow), rust/ services, and Temporal workers. Those non-Django writers issue raw INSERTs that only list the columns they care about, so any new NOT NULL column without a Postgres-level DEFAULT will break them with null value in column "<col>" violates not-null constraint.

Django's default= alone does not create a Postgres-level default — by design, Django treats it as a Python-only attribute applied at Model.__init__:

  • Callable defaults (default=list, default=dict, default=uuid.uuid4) are never emitted into SQL at all.
  • Scalar defaults (default=False, default=0, default="") are emitted as ADD COLUMN ... DEFAULT X NOT NULL and then immediately dropped by a follow-up ALTER COLUMN ... DROP DEFAULT — verify with ./manage.py sqlmigrate.

Before merging, grep for external writers of the table:

rg -n "INSERT INTO <table>|insertRow\(.*'<table>'" nodejs rust products services

If any match, add both default= and db_default= to the model field. db_default= lands a real Postgres DEFAULT; default= keeps the Python-side value for ORM creates:

class User(models.Model):
    hide_mcp_hints = models.BooleanField(default=False, db_default=False, null=False)

makemigrations will emit a plain AddField(..., db_default=False, default=False, ...), and sqlmigrate shows just ADD COLUMN ... DEFAULT false NOT NULL — no DROP DEFAULT follow-up.

db_default= is also load-bearing for the nodejs / rust test suites. posthog/management/commands/setup_test_environment.py calls disable_migrations() and builds the test schema directly from model definitions, skipping the migration entirely. Plain default= is invisible to that path; db_default= is what Django bakes into the generated CREATE TABLE. Without it, the postgres-parity and Jest jobs in .github/workflows/ci-nodejs.yml will fail on raw INSERTs even though ./manage.py migrate looks correct in isolation.

For modifying the default on an existing column (no ADD COLUMN), use a plain RunSQL instead:

migrations.RunSQL(
    sql="ALTER TABLE <table> ALTER COLUMN <col> SET DEFAULT '[]'::jsonb;",
    reverse_sql="ALTER TABLE <table> ALTER COLUMN <col> DROP DEFAULT;",
)

Always verify with ./manage.py sqlmigrate <app> <number> that no stray DROP DEFAULT slipped through, and confirm ./manage.py makemigrations --dry-run reports no state drift.

Repository
PostHog/posthog
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.