Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, highly actionable body that names exact tools, parameters, and field paths across a clearly sequenced workflow with built-in corroboration and quota checkpoints. Structure is clean with well-signaled one-level cross-skill links; minor conciseness trims remain.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and information-rich with every line earning its place (exact tool names, field paths, status enums, the credit/quota model) and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; a few spots (the ?tab= enumeration, some restating) could still be trimmed, keeping it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact MCP tools, query parameters (status=succeeded, order_by=-result_score, min_score/max_score), field paths (scanner_result.model_output, reasoning_segments), and a copy-paste URL pattern with ?t=<seconds>, covering each scanner type and question axis. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step Anchor→Pull→Read→Act sequence with explicit validation checkpoints — 'corroborate before you create work', confirm reproduction before turning a finding into a task, and a vision-quota-retrieve pre-check before batch scans — plus error triage guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single ~155-line file is well-organized with clear headers; cross-skill references ([[creating-replay-vision-scanners]], [[investigating-replay]], [[inbox-exploration]]) are one-level-deep and clearly signaled with no nested bundle indirection. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |