Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, highly actionable, and well-structured, with a clear multi-step workflow that includes explicit validation and determinism feedback loops. Progressive disclosure is appropriately handled for a single-file instruction skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, deferring build/docker prerequisites to the README rather than restating them, with no padding or concept explanation, matching the level-3 anchor for lean, token-efficient content where every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete file locations (src/cli.rs, src/scenarios/gate.rs, src/state.rs), named symbols (GateArgs, ChaosEvent), and executable commands (cargo build -p personhog-..., personhog-test-harness gate ...), meeting the level-3 anchor for fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step 'Adding a chaos scenario' sequence is clearly ordered with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Rehearse locally until deterministic — three consecutive green runs is the bar') and a feedback loop (make it deterministic if it's a lottery), matching the level-3 anchor for a clear sequence with explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with no bundle directories (references/scripts/assets absent); content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections and defers only build/usage detail to the README one level deep, which is appropriate structure for a skill of this size per the rubric's simple-skill note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |