Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable authoring guide that names the exact MCP tools, name contracts, and activation steps for each of the four skill kinds. It is concise and clearly sequenced; the main room for improvement is adding a concrete example skill-create invocation and trimming the opening overview.
Suggestions
Add one full `posthog:skill-create` example call with concrete name, description, and body arguments so the create step is copy-paste ready.
Tighten the opening pipeline overview — the per-kind sections already convey what each kind does, so the chunk/parallel/dedup mechanics can be shortened.
Include an explicit validation/retry checkpoint in the authoring flow (e.g. re-read the created skill and confirm the name prefix and body landed correctly before telling the user to activate it).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes Claude's competence (e.g. 'restating harness rules dilutes it'), but the opening pipeline overview and a few explanatory asides could be tightened slightly without losing clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance — specific MCP tool names (skill-list, skill-get, posthog:skill-create, posthog:skill-update), exact name contracts, and activation locations — but stops short of a full copy-paste example invocation with parameters, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step authoring flow is clearly sequenced with explicit gating checkpoints ('Don't start writing until the direction is picked', 'actually create the team LLMSkill row; never hand the user a body to copy-paste'), though it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into a kind table plus dedicated per-kind sections with clear headers; no external bundle files are needed or referenced, and structure is good, though the guide runs over 50 lines so it does not qualify for the simple-skill 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |