Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, well-structured API reference with executable examples and no filler, hindered mainly by a multi-step workflow ('adding a new notification type') that lacks an explicit validation checkpoint. Splitting the verbose field reference into a bundled file would further improve progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the 'Adding a new notification type' workflow (e.g. 'Run `python manage.py test notifications` and confirm the new type renders an icon in the menu') to raise workflow clarity.
Tighten the Priority paragraph by trimming the editorializing ('This is intentionally intrusive', 'Overusing critical will train users to ignore notifications entirely') to the concrete behavioral rule and the 'when in doubt, use normal' default.
Consider moving the full NotificationData required/optional field tables into a references/ file (e.g. REFERENCE.md) and linking to it from a short inline summary, to push progressive disclosure toward one-level-deep external references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, system-specific reference that assumes Claude's competence and explains no generic concepts; the Priority paragraph's editorializing ('Overusing critical will train users to ignore notifications entirely') and slight overlap between the intro and the description could be trimmed, keeping it just below fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready facade import and create_notification call plus a working test mock, with concrete field/type/target tables and exact file paths covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adding a new notification type' workflow has a clear 4-step sequence with exact paths, but contains no validation or verification checkpoint (no 'run tests' / 'verify migration created'), which caps it at 3 per the missing-validation guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, all content inline; at ~125 lines the full NotificationData field reference could arguably be externalized, and the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply, so it sits at good-but-not-fully-split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |