Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable SQL and a precise memory schema, and it practices good progressive disclosure by deferring generic mechanics to an external reference. The main weakness is repetition of the core discriminator concept, which inflates the token budget without adding new information.
Suggestions
Consolidate the "one staked account sliding while the fleet holds" discriminator into a single authoritative statement; later sections can reference it instead of restating it.
Consider splitting the scratchpad key taxonomy and the SQL query library into a local references/ file to shorten the SKILL.md overview.
Make the validation checkpoints (join check, fleet-held check, inbox dedupe) explicit numbered steps within the Decide flow so they read as enforced feedback loops rather than prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence (no basic concept explanation) and is domain-dense, but the core discriminator ("one staked account sliding while the fleet holds") is restated across the intro, profile table, Decide, and Disqualifiers sections, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides multiple complete, executable SQL queries (group-type discovery, engagement cliff, dormancy onset), exact tool names, and a precise scratchpad key taxonomy — copy-paste ready and covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear run cycle (Orient → Profile → Explore → Save memory → Decide → Close out) with real validation checkpoints (join verification, baseline confirmation, inbox dedupe, fleet-held quantification) and a Disqualifier checklist; a few checkpoints are implicit rather than enforced as feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Cleanly defers generic report mechanics to a clearly-signaled one-level-deep external reference (authoring-scouts → references/report-contract.md via skill-file-get) and keeps only customer-analytics framing inline; the inlined SQL/scratchpad schema is reasonable but the ~200-line body could split some detail into a local reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |