Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-structured instruction skill with concrete file/field references, explicit gates, and clear deprecation workflow. It is somewhat verbose and restates core invariants across several sections, which costs token efficiency without adding clarity for a competent reader.
Suggestions
Consolidate the pinning/dispatch rules so each invariant appears once; the same 'resolve via resolve_api_version, never hardcode a fallback' and 'don't silently move customers' points are repeated across 'How versioning works', the step list, 'Pinning semantics', and 'Common pitfalls'.
Tighten the longest sentences (e.g. the multi-clause dispatch paragraph) into shorter statements or a short list to improve scannability.
Consider moving the long 'Common pitfalls' enumeration into a separate reference file so the main workflow stays lean, since the skill already exceeds 100 lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly signal-dense, but several sentences are very long and restate the same invariant multiple ways (e.g. the pinning/dispatch rules are restated across 'How versioning works', the step list, 'Pinning semantics', and 'Common pitfalls'), adding tokens a competent reader could be spared. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance—specific files (sources/common/base.py, workflow_activities/import_data_sync.py), named fields, a concrete dispatch pattern (resolve_api_version → stripe_source → StripeClient(stripe_version=...)), and a PR title convention; minor gaps are that examples are illustrative rather than copy-paste blocks. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adding a new version, step by step' and 'Deprecating a version' sections are clearly numbered and sequenced with explicit validation gates (the diff gate, 'only once the gate says the version has to exist', idempotent/reviewable migration, the registry invariant test catching mistakes); minor gaps are that some checkpoints are prose rather than explicit verify-then-proceed markers. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-sectioned into overview, gate, steps, deprecation, pinning semantics, pitfalls, and self-improvement with no external bundle files; given there are no separate files to reference, the single-file organization is appropriate and navigable, with only minor inlining of material that could conceptually split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |