Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-sequenced orchestration skill that delegates executable detail to specialized sibling skills while retaining concrete directives, explicit validation checkpoints, and a clear feedback loop. Its only minor gap is relying on those references for fully copy-paste-ready commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~20-line body is lean and directive with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line ('Reproduce the failure on unchanged code, confirm it fails for the right reason') earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific (named files AGENTS.md/CONTRIBUTING.md, named skills, 'smallest causal fix', 'test explicit overrides and neighboring supported paths'), with only minor gaps from deferring executable detail to referenced skills. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced workflow (Establish the contract → Red, green, review → Publish and follow through) with explicit validation checkpoints and a feedback loop: 'If a required check fails, investigate and report evidence rather than hiding the failure.' | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep cross-skill links ([review-issue], [python-tests], [code-review], [review-pr]); as an orchestration skill with no own bundle files, this is appropriate progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |