Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A focused, highly actionable skill body built around executable code with a clear locate→query→fallback workflow and no unnecessary file sprawl. The main weakness is mild verbosity from explaining the SSR hydration concept Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Trim the '根本原因 (Root Cause)' section to one line explaining why hydration-block extraction is more stable than DOM scraping, dropping the general explanation of what SSR/hydration is.
Add a one-line guard showing expected fallback behavior when no SSR block matches (e.g., logging or returning a sentinel) so the workflow's error path is as concrete as its happy path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The '根本原因 (Root Cause)' section explains the SSR/hydration concept Claude already knows, and the '关键经验' section restates guidance already in the code; it is mostly efficient but could be tightened, so it sits at level 2 rather than the lean level-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The body provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready Python — a complete `extract_ssr_data` function with real regex patterns plus a jmespath query loop — matching the level-3 anchor of fully executable code with specific examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced (locate the SSR block → query with jmespath → fall back to the XHR API), and the code embeds validation (match checks, `isinstance(res, list)` and length checks); this matches the level-3 clear-sequence anchor for a simple, non-destructive task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files and the body is self-contained, organized into clear sections (Symptoms, Root Cause, Solution, Key Takeaways) with no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill provision for a level-3 score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |