Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is highly actionable with executable code and concrete guidance, and is cleanly sectioned. It loses points for property/enum redundancy, a missing post-fix verification step, and no use of separate reference files for the API material.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after applying the fix, e.g. re-run debugOutlineMaterials or visually confirm the outline stays constant across zoom levels.
Consolidate the 'Critical Properties' code block and 'API Reference' table into a single section to remove repeated outlineWidthMode/outlineWidthFactor entries.
Move the API reference table into a separate references file (e.g. reference/api.md) and link to it from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and avoids explaining basic concepts, but outline properties appear redundantly across 'Critical Properties' and the 'API Reference' table, and the enum values are restated, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready functions (adjustOutlineThickness, debugOutlineMaterials), a concrete factor-value guideline table, and specific property names — no pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A diagnose-then-fix flow is present with a useful call-timing checkpoint, but there is no explicit verification step (e.g. confirming the outline stays consistent across zoom levels after the fix), leaving the feedback loop incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear single-level sections with no nested references, but everything is inline in a body over 50 lines and no bundle files exist, so material like the API reference table that could live in a separate file is not split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |