Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body with executable commands throughout and genuine bundle files backing its references. The weaknesses are the missing validation/feedback loop around destructive swap execution (capping workflow clarity) and mild redundancy across the quote/execute examples.
Suggestions
Sequence the swap workflow explicitly with checkpoints: check balances → get quote → verify quote details and recipient address → execute → confirm the resulting transaction, satisfying the destructive-operation validation requirement.
Trim redundancy: keep one canonical quote example and let the task guide reference it, rather than repeating the same invocation in Quick start, the task table, and the CLI section.
Signal references/token-swaps.md at its point of use (e.g., in the quote/execute sections) instead of only in the footer References list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and free of concept over-explanation, but has minor redundancy: the same quote/execute invocation pattern appears in Quick start, the task guide, and the CLI section, and the HTML comment about wallet-provider env vars duplicates guidance restated in the Execute section. This fits 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' better than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Everything is executable and copy-paste ready: concrete CLI commands with example addresses, a full mcporter MCP call with JSON args, a parameter table for get_token_swap_quote, a shell-script invocation, and exact env-var names. This matches the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Tasks are presented as a parallel menu (quote / execute / balances) rather than a sequenced workflow, and swap execution is a destructive, irreversible funds-moving operation with no validation or feedback loop in the workflow itself — only a brief 'Verify token contract addresses independently' note in the Security section. Per the rubric's cap for destructive operations without validation steps, workflow clarity cannot exceed 3; it is not 2 because the task guide and parameter table do give a coherent rough sequence. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with well-organized sections, a one-level-deep References section pointing to the real references/token-swaps.md, and a script table matching the real scripts/opensea-swap.sh. It falls short of 5 because the single reference is listed only in a footer References list rather than signaled at its point of use, and inline detail (e.g., the full MCP parameter table) is not split into the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |