Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly executable procedural skill with excellent workflow sequencing, validation checkpoints, and verbatim error handling. Its weaknesses are minor: an undefined 'aesthetic classes' concept, an unspecified '<hash>' convention, and some duplicated session-wide instructions.
Suggestions
Define the 'aesthetic classes' used for direction-B/C/D generation (or point to a reference file enumerating them) so the showcase flow is fully executable without guessing.
Specify how the '<hash>' in /tmp/ui-craftsman-<hash>/ is derived (e.g., a short hash of the URL) to remove ambiguity across all modes.
Consolidate the repeated 'include the preview URL and describe what is visible' rule into the 'During a Session' section instead of restating it inside Mode 1's steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and procedural with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but it has minor redundancy: the 'always include the localhost preview URL and describe what is visible' rule is stated both in Mode 1 steps 6–7 and again in the 'During a Session' section, and the read/update of ui-prefs.md is repeated across modes. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are fully executable with exact paths, arguments, exit-code semantics, and verbatim user-facing error strings ('That URL is blocked for security reasons...'). Minor gaps: the '<hash>' naming convention is never defined, and direction B/C/D 'aesthetic classes' are referenced but never enumerated or defined anywhere in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each mode is a clearly numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (validate.py before extraction with abort-on-fail, iterate-on-feedback loop 'until user approves') and a dedicated Error Handling section with recovery commands (playwright install, gh auth login), matching the top anchor's feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All referenced bundle paths (scripts/validate.py, extract.py, serve.py, share.py, requirements.txt) resolve to real files and are clearly signaled with exact commands; share.py's full argument list is deferred one level via '--help'. The gap: aesthetic-class definitions and the Preference Memory Format detail live inline with no references/ directory, so some content that would benefit from splitting is not separated. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |