Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-structured red-teaming technique catalog with concrete example payloads and a probe config, but its test workflow lacks an explicit sequenced validation loop and the custom multi-turn harness is not provided as executable code.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered test workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g., craft probe → run multi-turn → check detection signals → confirm severity → retry on miss).
Provide an executable python_provider multi-turn harness skeleton instead of only noting that one is needed.
Tighten or relocate the two-line intro so the body assumes Claude's competence throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and uses shorthand ('RAG-w/-history', '→', 'doc w/'), with only minor over-explanation in the two-line intro that frames concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete example payloads, a promptfoo YAML probe config, detection signals, and defender mitigations are provided; the gap is that the custom multi-turn test harness is described but not supplied as executable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The technique catalog implies a test sequence (probe → detect → severity), but checkpoints are implicit via detection signals and there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized single file with clear section headers (Techniques, Probe pattern, Detection signals, Severity, Defender, Cross-references) and no external references needed; at ~90 lines it slightly exceeds the 50-line simple-skill exception. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |