Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured attack-technique catalog with highly actionable copy-paste prompts and a concrete probe configuration. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints tying the probe, detection, and severity sections together into a feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add a short ordered workflow (run probes → check detection signals → rate severity → escalate/descop) with an explicit validation checkpoint before reporting a finding.
Move the long list of T10.001 prompt variations into a references file and keep a concise representative subset inline, enabling one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
Tighten the prose asides in T10.005 ("Theoretical…", "Rarely practical…") to bullet form to recover token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — compact bullet lists of copy-paste prompts and a YAML config assuming Claude knows the domain — with only minor prose asides ("Theoretical…", "Rarely practical due to query economics", "The big one.") that could be trimmed, fitting anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete copy-paste attack prompts (ten numbered variations) and a concrete YAML probe config covering the common cases, but T10.005 is largely descriptive and there is no automation script, leaving minor gaps that fit anchor 4 over the fully-executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a reference catalog, not a sequenced workflow; only a light "try in order of subtlety" sequence exists, and the batch probe operation has no integrated validation checkpoints (detection signals live in a separate section), so the missing-validation cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the single self-contained file is well-organized with clear section headers; at ~115 lines it exceeds the under-50-line exception and has no one-level-deep references, so it earns the good-structure anchor 4 rather than the reference-split anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |