The body is dense and lean — terse technique bullets, a compact probe snippet, a severity table, and targeted defender controls — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

It provides an executable copy-paste `hey` probe command, specific monitoring metrics (cost/min, p99 latency, 429/503 rate), and concrete defender controls (enforced max_tokens, 60s streaming timeout), meeting the fully-executable anchor.

Sections are organized (techniques, probe, detection, severity, defender) but there is no explicit sequenced workflow with validation/feedback checkpoints, and this multi-technique catalog is not a single-action skill that the simple-skill exception covers.

It is a single self-contained file with clear section navigation and no nested or broken references; no bundle files are present to verify, and the cross-references point appropriately to sibling skills.

The description lists multiple concrete attack vectors — 'Endpoint DoS via expensive prompts', 'model-API account exhaustion', 'GPU resource starvation', 'billing weaponization' — matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

It clearly states what the skill covers but contains no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 2.

It mixes natural terms a user might say (DoS, billing, GPU) with technical jargon ('model-API account exhaustion', 'billing weaponization') and lacks common phrasings, so it is not the full-coverage level 3.

The 'Infrastructure & Economic Warfare' framing with LLM-specific cost dynamics is a clear niche unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, despite minor overlap with classical DoS.