Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured instruction skill with concrete defaults, a useful trigger table, a validation checklist, and a complete schema reference. Its main weaknesses are a dangling 'interview answers' reference, no example output artifact, and no re-validation feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — trigger catalog and schema are carried by compact tables with almost no over-explanation of known concepts. Only the two-sentence motivational intro and minor schema duplication keep it from anchor-5 leanness. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete defaults (hallucination_threshold 3, destructive_action_gate True, 'verify-evidence-hash'), a severity/response table, full field schema, and an explicit output path make the guidance mostly executable. 'Based on the interview answers' references an interview never defined in this skill, and there is no example of a completed plan/abort.json. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced with a pre-write validation checklist and an anti-patterns section. It lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for the output artifact (e.g., run the AbortPlan validator and fix on failure), so it does not reach anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-sectioned single file with clear headers and no nested or buried references. The body is over the ~50-line simple-skill threshold and the document-schema tables are reference material that could be split out, which leaves minor organization gaps versus anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |