CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

abort-template

Abort / crisis plan generator — halt triggers, response actions, AI-aware safety gates (hallucination threshold, destructive-action gate, output validation).

62

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/decepticon/decepticon/skills/standard/soundwave/abort-template/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured, concise, and actionable with explicit validation for a safety-critical generator skill; the only meaningful gap is the absence of a post-write validation feedback loop.

Suggestions

Add a post-write validation step to the workflow (e.g. 'After writing plan/abort.json, validate against decepticon.core.schemas.AbortPlan; on schema error, fix and re-validate') to close the validate→fix→retry loop and lift workflow_clarity to 5.

Tighten the intro paragraphs slightly — the 'Without it, the autonomous loop runs through...' sentence and the dated OWASP citation could be trimmed to a one-line rationale.

Optionally move the engagement-signal table's less-common rows (e.g. C2 beacon loss) to a reference file to keep the core workflow scannable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence — specific defaults ("hallucination_threshold default 3", "destructive_action_gate default True") with no padding of concepts Claude knows — with only minor over-explanation in the intro and OWASP citation, fitting 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' rather than the fully lean 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance — named schema fields with defaults, a trigger→severity→response table, and a target output path ("plan/abort.json validating against decepticon.core.schemas.AbortPlan") — with only minor gaps, so it lands at 'mostly executable guidance' rather than copy-paste-ready 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced and a 'Validation Checklist' provides explicit pre-write checkpoints for this safety-critical, destructive-capable skill; it falls short of 5 only because there is no post-write validate→fix→retry feedback loop after plan/abort.json is written.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

With no bundle files present and the skill under ~65 lines, the well-organized sections (When to Use, Workflow, Validation Checklist, Anti-patterns, Output) are appropriately self-contained with no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and occupies a distinct niche, but it omits an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause in the description field itself ( relegating triggers to metadata), which caps completeness at 3.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when ...' clause to the description field with concrete trigger phrases (e.g. 'Use when creating an abort plan, emergency halt, or AI safety gate'), so the description field self-contains its trigger guidance.

Include a few natural synonyms users actually say ("emergency stop", "kill switch", "e-stop") alongside the existing trigger terms.

Keep the current concision — it is already lean; just front-load the trigger clause before the gate list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ("Abort / crisis plan generator") and lists several concrete components — "halt triggers, response actions, AI-aware safety gates (hallucination threshold, destructive-action gate, output validation)" — with only minor coverage gaps, fitting the 'several specific actions' anchor rather than the fully comprehensive 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

The description gives a clear 'what' but no explicit 'Use when...' clause — trigger guidance lives only in metadata.when_to_use, not the description field — so per the rubric guideline completeness is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a user would say ("abort", "crisis plan", "halt triggers", "safety gates") alongside technical gate names; good coverage but a few common synonyms (e.g. "emergency stop") are absent, so it sits above the midpoint but short of comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The abort/crisis-plan niche with AI-safety gates is a clear, distinct specialization unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
PurpleAILAB/Decepticon
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.