CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

api-soap-wsdl

SOAP / WSDL exploitation — WSDL enumeration via ?wsdl, XXE in SOAP envelope, WS-Addressing replay, WS-Security UsernameToken brute, SAML token injection in WS-Trust, schema validation bypass.

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/decepticon/decepticon/skills/standard/exploit/api/soap-wsdl/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An actionable, lean SOAP/WSDL attack catalog with concrete payloads and good section structure, weakened by the absence of validation checkpoints and a real sequenced workflow for the XML/batch operations it describes.

Suggestions

Add explicit verification steps for risky operations, e.g. confirm XXE success by checking for leaked file contents before escalating, and validate that a captured UsernameToken decodes before brute-forcing.

Turn the brute-force hint into an executable snippet (a loop over a wordlist with a success discriminator) to close the actionability gap.

Consider moving the longer exploit payloads (XML bomb, full SAML/XSW) into a reference file with one-line pointers from the catalog to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean and code-driven with brief, relevant context lines; avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, with only minor phrases that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready curl commands and full XML payloads (XXE, XML bomb, SOAPAction routing), but the UsernameToken brute section is a high-level hint ('cycle a username dict') rather than executable code.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Content is organized as a technique catalog (Discovery → attacks → Tooling → OPSEC) rather than a sequenced workflow, and there are no validation/verification checkpoints for the XML-manipulation and brute-force operations, capping workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with no nested references and no bundle files needed; the inline attack catalog is reasonable for the scope, with only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, distinctive description that enumerates concrete SOAP/WSDL attack techniques, but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when attacking SOAP/WSDL services (.asmx, .svc, Spring-WS) or when the user mentions SOAP, WSDL, WS-Security, or WS-Trust.'

Surface the file-extension triggers (.asmx, .svc, spring-ws) into the description itself rather than only in metadata.when_to_use.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists six concrete exploitation techniques ('WSDL enumeration via ?wsdl', 'XXE in SOAP envelope', 'WS-Addressing replay', 'WS-Security UsernameToken brute', 'SAML token injection in WS-Trust', 'schema validation bypass') — comprehensive coverage of specific actions.

5 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' with a concrete technique list, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Strong niche vocabulary a pentester would actually say (SOAP, WSDL, ?wsdl, WS-Security, SAML, WS-Trust), but natural file-extension triggers (.asmx, .svc) live in metadata.when_to_use rather than the description itself, leaving a few natural terms missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear, narrow niche (SOAP/WSDL exploitation) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk against other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
PurpleAILAB/Decepticon
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.