Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized instruction-only security skill with a clear multi-step chain and an explicit validation checkpoint; its only weakness is actionability that lacks the operational specifics to be fully executable.
Suggestions
Add concrete operational detail to each step, e.g. how to detect the IDOR target object, how to escalate (token theft vs. role parameter tampering), and how to evidence the privileged action.
Optionally include a short example payload or request-shape illustration to make the chain copy-paste ready while staying concise.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is maximally lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g. what IDOR or privilege escalation is); every line is actionable instruction, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance names concrete objects and actions ('steal recovery token', 'admin-level action', 'before/after authorization state') but stops short of operational specifics needed to fully execute, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step numbered 'Canonical path' is paired with an explicit 'Validation' step requiring before/after authorization evidence, matching 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps'. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well under 50 lines, needs no external references (no bundle files exist), and is organized into 'Canonical path' and 'Validation' sections, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |