Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable catalog-and-workflow body with excellent token efficiency and clear navigation to sub-skills, held back only by the absence of an explicit validation/retry feedback loop in the batch audit workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/retry loop around the batch PoC step, e.g. 'If a PoC fails to reproduce, refine the exploit vector and re-run forge test; only promote reproducible PoCs.'
Expand the terse tool calls (step 2 'solidity_scan_file on each file' and step 6 'foundry_reentrancy_test etc.') with their argument signatures so every step is fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a catalog table, a numbered workflow of concrete commands, and a severity table — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (what Solidity/Slither/reentrancy are); not level 2 because there is no unnecessary padding to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands ('find /workspace/src -name "*.sol"', 'slither . --json slither.json', 'forge test -vvv --match-contract Test_') and named tool calls with args ('slither_ingest("/workspace/slither.json")', 'kg_query(kind="vulnerability", min_severity="high")'); not level 2 because the guidance is executable rather than pseudocode, despite minor terseness in step 2 and the 'etc.' in step 6. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step sequence is clear and the forge-test pass gate (step 7→8) is an implicit checkpoint, but this batch operation (scanning all files, generating PoCs for every high) lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, capping it at 2 per the batch-operations guideline; not level 3 because there is no explicit error-recovery loop, and not level 1 because the sequence is present and ordered. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview (Playbooks, Workflow, Default severity floor) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to sub-skills via a 'Use for' table; no bundle files exist, and the under-50-line body is appropriately split, so it earns 3 per the simple-skills note; not level 2 because references are clearly signaled rather than vague. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |