Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable operator guide with a clear core loop and validation for a destructive workflow, held back by references to reference.md and examples.md that are not present in the bundle. Conciseness and actionability are strong; progressive disclosure is the weakest dimension due to the missing bundle files.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced reference.md and examples.md (or move the essential parameter schemas and one worked run inline) so the body's links resolve and the skill is self-contained.
Tighten the 'Mental model' and 'Authorization' sections, which overlap with the description and the core loop, to reclaim tokens.
Add a concise validate→fix→retry loop for the error/timeout case (e.g., read cause → send_message a targeted fix → re-check status) to push workflow clarity to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and operator-focused — it does not explain what pentesting or nmap is and every section earns its place — but the mental-model and authorization sections lightly restate information already conveyed elsewhere and could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: a full tools table with key args and return fields, and real call shapes like 'decepticon_start_engagement(targets=[…], instruction="In scope: …; Out of scope: …", scan_mode="standard")' and 'decepticon_send_message(thread_id, "skip the staging host, focus on the API")'. Minor gaps because full parameter schemas and worked runs are deferred to reference.md/examples.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step 'core loop' is a clear numbered sequence with explicit checkpoints ('stop polling when status is terminal or findings_available is true') and an errors-and-recovery section providing feedback loops; the non-negotiable authorization step supplies the validation a destructive skill requires, so the destructive-cap does not apply. Falls just short of 5 because recovery is 'offer to fix or start fresh' rather than a tight validate→fix→retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well structured as an overview with clearly signaled one-level references to '[reference.md](reference.md)' and '[examples.md](examples.md)', but those referenced files do not exist in the bundle (no references/ directory), so the disclosure promise is unfulfilled and navigation breaks — more than a minor organization gap. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |