Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The playbook is highly actionable with executable Solidity/Foundry examples and a clearly sequenced audit workflow, well-organized into focused sections. Minor room to tighten framing prose and make the audit validation feedback loop explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Solidity/DeFi competence (one-line framing, terse source list, focused code blocks), but contains minor explanatory asides like "They're not vulnerabilities themselves — they're a force multiplier" and the parenthetical ERC4626/reentrancy note that could be trimmed — the efficient 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready Solidity snippets for each pattern, an executable grep one-liner, a concrete Foundry PoC template with real Aave V3 pool address and assertGt check, and an explicit foundry_inflation_test(...) tool call — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Audit steps' are clearly sequenced (locate integrations → per-handler checks → price-reading functions → share-mint/burn with a Foundry validation test) with concrete sub-checks, but the feedback loop (fail → fix → re-validate) is implicit rather than an explicit checkpoint — the 4 anchor with minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear single-purpose sections (attack patterns, audit steps, severity, PoC, OPSEC, remediation, exemplars) with clearly signaled one-level-deep cross-references to sibling skills (oracle-manipulation/SKILL.md, reentrancy/); no bundle files exist, and sections like Known exemplars/PoC template could arguably split into references, so 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |