Evidence-led ics operator technical methods and evidence interpretation for the relevant environment.
68%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./packages/decepticon/decepticon/skills/standard/ics/specialist-methods/SKILL.mdUse the relevant existing technique skills for implementation details. These notes explain technical prerequisites and evidentiary limits; they do not define an engagement stage order, dispatch policy, or report lifecycle. Tool availability and argument names come from the live schema. Authorization comes from the RoE.
Passive captures and read-only identification can reveal vendor, firmware, unit IDs, function codes, exposed management paths and protocol authentication. Tools such as modbus-cli, python-snap7 and OPC UA clients differ in default behavior; consult the existing ICS technique skills and confirm a command is read-only before use. A writable register or PLC interface does not establish process-level impact.
Interpret register values against device model, scaling, process state and the operator's safety envelope. Capture baseline state and restoration evidence for any separately authorized write test. An emulator result does not prove that the same operation is safe on a live controller. Preserve network segment, device identity and observation timestamps; loss of telemetry during a test is a blocker, not evidence of successful control.
PurpleAILAB/Decepticon
49888ee
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.