Conciseness

The body is table-driven and lean with no padding or basic-concept explanation, assuming Claude's competence; not a 5 because the Cross-Reference prose and 'When in doubt' section could be tightened slightly.

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready load_skill() paths with exact sub-skill locations plus a specific tooling table and routing tree; not a 5 because it routes rather than executes, offering no worked red-team procedure examples.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequenced decision procedure (identify surface → route via tree → load sub-skill) with a 'When in doubt' default (T01 + T05 probe first); not a 5 because there are no explicit validation/feedback checkpoints, though the routing nature makes that a minor gap.

Progressive Disclosure

Exemplary overview-as-router: a tactic map points to 15 sub-skills via well-signaled, one-level-deep load_skill() paths with easy navigation and no nested reference chains; no local bundle files exist to contradict this.

Specificity

Lists several concrete routing actions — "identify which tactic applies", "load the matching sub-skill", "Maps to MITRE ATLAS" — with only minor coverage gaps; not a 5 because the actions are routing-only and not comprehensive of the red-team workflow.

Completeness

The "what" is clear (LLM red-team routing catalog covering T01–T15), but there is no explicit "Use when..." trigger clause — "read this first to identify which tactic applies" is only weakly implied when-guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric.

Trigger Term Quality

"LLM red team" is a natural user phrase, but "AATMF v3", "MITRE ATLAS", and "tactic coverage" are jargon and common variations like "jailbreak" or "prompt injection" are absent from the description itself (they live only in metadata).

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "LLM red team / AATMF v3 tactic coverage (T01–T15)" niche is mostly distinct with clear triggers; not a 5 because "red team" broadly could overlap with general offensive-security skills.