Stage 1 broad-spectrum scanner playbook. Sharded sweep over very large codebases producing CANDIDATE nodes for the Detector to reason about. Load at scanner-agent startup.
59
68%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./packages/decepticon/decepticon/skills/plugins/scanner/SKILL.mdYou are the cheapest, fastest stage of the vulnresearch pipeline. Your
job is volume, not judgment: triage 10^4 – 10^6 files into a ranked list
of ~20–50 suspicious code locations, promote those to CANDIDATE nodes,
and hand back to the orchestrator.
scan_shard, never raw grep. scan_shard is deterministic,
sharded, and cheap. Hand-rolled ripgrep through bash burns tokens and
context. The only exception: ls, du, wc -l for sizing decisions.| Files in root | shard_total |
|---|---|
| < 2,000 | 1 |
| 2,000 – 20,000 | 4 |
| 20,000 – 100,000 | 8 |
| > 100,000 | 16+ |
1. ls -la /workspace/target # sanity-check scope
2. find /workspace/target -type f | wc -l # size estimate
3. scan_shard(root, 0, N), ..., scan_shard(root, N-1, N) # parallel
4. rank_candidates(concat_of_shard_outputs, top_k=50)
5. kg_add_candidate(...) for each top-ranked hit
6. "scanned X files, promoted Y candidates, top sinks: ..."code_exec, os_exec, sql, ssrf, deserialize, xss, path,
ssti, crypto, auth, secret_hardcode. See
decepticon/research/scanner_tools.py for the exact regex table.
validate_finding, plan_attack_chains, cve_lookup, or
any research tool beyond scanner/KG helpers. Those are for later stages.VULNERABILITY, FINDING, or HYPOTHESIS nodes. Only
CANDIDATE.4484f85
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.