Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with copy-paste grep commands and payloads, a clear ordered methodology, and a validation contract, suffering only from minor conciseness padding and the absence of an explicit retry feedback loop, making it a strong but not perfect skill body.
Suggestions
Tighten the opening paragraph and remove parenthetical asides (e.g., the 'Models often quote the rule verbatim...' note) to push conciseness toward anchor 5.
Add an explicit validate-then-retry loop to the audit workflow (e.g., 'Run the negative_command; if success_patterns still match the leaked text, mark confirmed; if negative_patterns appear, mark a false positive and re-run with a fresh account') to lift workflow_clarity.
If the skill grows, split the PoC payload catalogue and CVSS tables into references/payloads.md and references/cvss.md with one-level-deep links to keep the overview lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and information-rich with no beginner concept padding, but retains a few trimmable asides (e.g., 'This finding type is the highest-yield reconnaissance step on any LLM engagement — do it before anything else.' and parentheticals like '(Models often quote the rule verbatim while declining to break it.)'), matching anchor 4's 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready grep commands, concrete payload strings in fenced blocks, a reflected-via-tool-argument example, a validate_finding contract with success/negative patterns, and CVSS vectors covering the common cases, matching anchor 5's 'fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered methodology (recognition → attack vectors → audit workflow → exploitation → PoC → validate → CVSS → chain) with an audit checklist and a validate_finding contract acting as a verification step, but lacks an explicit feedback-loop (run → check output → fix → retry), fitting anchor 4's 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than the explicit-retry anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file with no bundle references, organized into 8 well-signaled numbered sections; content is appropriately placed for a single-file skill but exceeds the ~50-line simple-skill threshold where some payload catalogues/CVSS tables could plausibly be split out, matching anchor 4's 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |