Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured with executable commands throughout. Its main weaknesses are duplicated mode descriptions and the absence of an explicit validation/confirmation checkpoint for the destructive `--all` batch operation.
Suggestions
Collapse the mode list in 'How It Works' and 'Instructions' into a single source of truth to remove redundancy and improve conciseness.
Add an explicit confirmation/validation checkpoint before running `--all` (e.g. list affected executions and require user confirmation) to lift workflow clarity.
State the verification feedback loop up front — 'after cancelling, run `ooo status` to confirm' — as an explicit workflow step rather than only a footer suggestion.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and command-driven, but the three modes are described twice — once in 'How It Works' and again in 'Instructions' — adding redundancy that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable bash commands for every mode (bare, explicit, --all, custom --reason) plus a worked example, which is copy-paste ready and matches the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (determine mode → run command → present results → suggest next step), but the destructive batch `--all` path lacks an explicit validation/confirmation checkpoint, capping workflow clarity at 2 per the batch-operation guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single cohesive command document with clearly labeled sections (Usage, How It Works, Instructions, State Transitions, Fallback, Example) and no nested external references, fitting the 'well-organized sections, no need for external references' allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |