Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-sequenced bugfix workflow with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops. It is highly actionable with concrete commands, with only minor conciseness and actionability gaps in delegation guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor over-explanation such as the rationale for not skipping reproduction and the Iteration Rules section restating logic already embedded in the steps. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands (gh issue view template, npm run build && npm run bundle, node dist/cli.js) and explicit status codes, though agent-delegation guidance ('State only the goal') and 'Read the relevant code and make the fix' remain somewhat abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-step process with explicit validation checkpoints (NOT_REPRODUCED, STILL_BROKEN, VERIFIED_FIXED), feedback loops back to Step 3, a self-audit pass, and a bounded iteration limit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a self-contained single-file workflow that needs no external bundle; stops short of 5 only because there is no overview-to-detail file split, which is not strictly needed here. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |