Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, well-organized harness skill: executable commands and a sequenced verify-loop workflow with one clearly signaled reference file. Minor conciseness trims and slightly deeper file splitting would push it to the top anchor.
Suggestions
Tighten a few guiding sentences (e.g. the DevTools 'Always take a fresh snapshot' and the closing 'Stop and ask' paragraph) to reach the leanest token budget.
Consider moving the Chrome DevTools MCP step list or log-path catalog into a short reference file to improve progressive disclosure beyond a single bundled reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, actionable prose that assumes competence and avoids explaining known concepts; a few guiding sentences ('Always take a fresh snapshot...', 'Stop and ask the user only when...') could be trimmed further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands and tool calls throughout (rg log search, bun run scripts, mcp__chrome_devtools.* sequence, typecheck commands), covering the common debugging cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Harness Loop gives a clear 7-step sequence with explicit verification (step 6) and a reproduce/verify feedback loop; destructive/audit-like changes are gated by 'stop and ask' guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured sections with a single clearly signaled one-level reference (references/harness-principles.md, which exists); most detail is inline, so it is good but not a textbook multi-file split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |