Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-engineered multi-phase workflow: tightly written, actionable with concrete commands and named tooling, and sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and bounded feedback loops. Organization is clear and self-contained, so no progressive-disclosure changes are needed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: each phase uses terse bullets and an 'Output:' line, and it does not explain concepts Claude already knows, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'; it is tighter than the level-2 example that adds unnecessary justification. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete commands ('npm run build', 'npm run typecheck', 'npm run bundle', 'node dist/cli.js'), specific artifact paths, and named tools/agents; the guidance is actionable even though much is instructional, so it is not penalized for absence of code per the scoring notes. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight phases are explicitly sequenced, each producing a concrete artifact, with validation checkpoints and feedback loops ('until all groups pass', 'two consecutive clean passes', 'do not loop more than 3 times'), matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are present, so this is judged on organization; the body is split into clearly headed, navigable sections with no nested references, satisfying the well-organized-sections allowance for content that needs no external detail files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |