Conciseness

The body opens directly with the mechanism ('The repository script owns the Git mechanics') and never explains Git or commit basics Claude already knows; every section (Contract, Modes, Workflow, Rules) earns its place. Matches the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor; not 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation or padding.

Actionability

Provides fully executable commands throughout — 'OPENWORK_DIR=/path/to/openwork bun run desktop-openwork-sync --mode export', 'bun run desktop-openwork-sync --mode export --source-base <qwen-code-ref>', and verification commands like 'git diff --check HEAD' and 'git diff --name-status <target-base>..HEAD' — copy-paste ready with placeholders. Not 2 because the code is real and executable, not pseudocode.

Workflow Clarity

A five-step numbered workflow with validation up front (step 1 checks clean worktrees), conflict-resolution guidance (step 3), and explicit verification (step 4), plus the Contract documents feedback loops ('the sync stops so the agent can convert that resolution into a normal follow-up commit'). Not 2 because explicit checkpoints and error-recovery are present.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent) and the ~80-line body is organized into clear Contract/Modes/Workflow/Rules sections with no nested or deeply chained references; per the simple-skill note, well-organized inline content scores 3. Not 2 because content is appropriately self-contained rather than a wall of text or misplaced reference.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'commit-by-commit path migration', 'exporting qwen-code desktop changes to OpenWork', 'importing OpenWork desktop changes', 'preserving target-owned overlay files such as README.md', 'resolving sync conflicts', 'preparing sync PR branches' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor; not 2 because the action set is comprehensive rather than partial.

Completeness

Explicitly states what ('commit-by-commit path migration' between the two repos) and an explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple triggers, matching the 'clearly answers both what AND when' anchor; not 2 because the when guidance is explicit, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural phrasings a user would actually say — 'exporting...changes to OpenWork', 'importing...changes into qwen-code', 'resolving sync conflicts', 'preparing sync PR branches' — giving good coverage of common variations; not 2 because it spans export, import, conflict, and PR scenarios rather than a single keyword.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A narrow niche — syncing between two named repos (qwen-code <-> OpenWork) via commit-by-commit migration — with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for an unrelated skill; not 2 because the two-repo, path-migration framing is too specific to overlap with generic sync skills.