Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, actionable, and well-organized with exact commands and specific rules, scoring high on conciseness, actionability, and progressive disclosure. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow for template-heading preservation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive throughout — 'Create PR metadata files only. Do not push, comment, or run `gh pr create`' — with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; matches the 3-anchor where every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact, copy-paste-ready commands ('git diff origin/main...HEAD', 'git log -1 --pretty=%B'), specific file paths (pr-title.txt, pr-body.md), and concrete rules; not 2 because guidance is complete and executable rather than pseudocode or missing key details. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1-5 sequence plus a 'Common Mistakes' checklist, but no explicit validation checkpoint (e.g. confirm all original template headings are retained before finishing); matches the 2-anchor of sequence present but checkpoints missing/implicit, not 3 which requires explicit validation steps. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (Inputs, Required Outputs, Workflow, PR Body Rules, Common Mistakes), which the simple-skills note allows to score 3 on organization alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |