CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

qwen-code-claw

Use Qwen Code as a Code Agent for code understanding, project generation, features, bug fixes, refactoring, and various programming tasks

56

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.qwen/skills/qwen-code-claw/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with copy-paste commands and a clear structure, but redundancy across sections and the absence of validation checkpoints for destructive/batch workflows and bundled deep-dive files limit its scores.

Suggestions

Add explicit validate-then-proceed feedback loops for batch/destructive operations (e.g., verify tests pass before applying a fix with '--approve-all').

Consolidate duplicate material — merge the two Authentication sections and remove Best Practices items that restate Approval Modes and Global Options.

Move the inlined ACPX/QwenCode CLI reference into bundled reference files in ./references/ and link to them from the overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with terse tables and code blocks, but contains redundant sections (e.g., Best Practices restates Approval Modes/Global Options, two Authentication sections) that could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable copy-paste commands throughout (install, auth, acpx invocations) plus a complete CLI syntax and global options reference covering common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequenced install/auth/usage flows are present, but batch and potentially destructive operations (e.g., '--approve-all', 'apply the smallest safe fix') lack explicit validation checkpoints, capping this at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section structure and external doc pointers exist, but no bundle files are provided and a large CLI/config reference is inlined monolithically rather than split into separate files.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and names concrete programming actions, but it lacks an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause and uses a broad catch-all tail that raises overlap risk.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when fixing bugs, refactoring, or generating new projects and features').

Replace 'various programming tasks' with specific actions to improve both specificity and trigger-term coverage.

Add common natural synonyms users say, such as 'review PRs', 'write tests', or 'explain code'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('code understanding, project generation, features, bug fixes, refactoring') with the domain named, though 'various programming tasks' is a catch-all gap.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated but there is no 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains natural trigger phrases users would say ('bug fixes', 'refactoring', 'project generation') with good coverage, though common synonyms like 'review PR' or 'explain code' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming a specific tool (Qwen Code) gives a niche, but the broad action list ('various programming tasks') overlaps heavily with other coding-agent skills.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
QwenLM/qwen-code
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.