Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced diagnostic skill with executable commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and thoughtful fallback handling. Minor conciseness and progressive-disclosure improvements are possible but the core guidance is strong.
Suggestions
State the credential-redaction rule once near the top and reference it, instead of repeating it at each command-quoting point.
Consider hoisting the longer shell command blocks into a references/ file to slim the SKILL.md overview and improve progressive disclosure.
Tighten the regex-matching rationale in 'What to look for' — the anchored-path explanation can be compressed without losing the false-positive warning.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense with non-obvious cross-platform gotchas (grep -E/\b, ss -p permissions, lsof -nP) that earn their tokens, but the credential-redaction note is repeated across sections and the regex rationale is somewhat verbose. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready shell commands throughout (ps, grep, node -e, lsof, ss, sample, /proc/pid/stack) with macOS/Linux variants covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with explicit validation (kill -0 PID liveness, qwen-path guard, sustained-CPU re-sample) and feedback/fallback loops (sidecar→ps, lsof→timeout, ss→lsof); diagnostic-only so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (What to look for, Argument validation, Investigation steps, Report, Notes) and self-contained with no external refs, but at ~115 lines it is not the lean overview-with-one-level-references ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |