Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable checklist with concrete paths and commands and a verification step. The only gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop on the verification step.
Suggestions
Add a short feedback loop to step 6: 'If lint/tests fail, fix and re-run until clean' to lift workflow_clarity to 5.
Consider noting what to do if a requested primitive is missing from kel-ui-components (the fallback path) to close the small actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean 26-line body that assumes Claude's competence — every line states a convention, path, or command with no padding or explanation of basic concepts; matches the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance throughout — exact import syntax ("import { Button } from 'kel-ui-components'"), path aliases ("@/lib/animations"), file locations, and runnable commands ("bun run lint", "bunx vitest run src/components/__tests__/<Name>.test.tsx") covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 6: "Verify: bun run lint and bunx vitest run..."); not a 5 because there is no explicit feedback loop (fix-and-re-run) for when verification fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clear 'Conventions to follow' and 'Steps' sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |