Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is an exemplary project-conventions skill: terse, purely project-specific, sequenced into steps with concrete verification commands, and appropriately sized so no progressive disclosure is needed. The single weak point is the incompletely specified error-boundary tier selection for lazy homepage sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — every line carries project-specific information Claude could not know (exact paths, "that dir is mostly legacy", "globals: true", forced dark mode) with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable — exact file paths, an import example, and copy-paste verify commands ("bun run lint", "bunx vitest run src/components/__tests__/<Name>.test.tsx") — but the error-boundary tier instruction ("Pick the error-boundary tier (`ComponentErrorBoundary` for granular) that matches blast radius") names only one tier, leaving a minor gap for the homepage-section case, so anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps ending in an explicit verification step with exact commands; this is not a destructive or batch operation so no validation cap applies, and as a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines its unambiguous sequence matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and this under-50-line skill needs none; the two well-organized sections ("Conventions to follow", "Steps") satisfy the simple-skill condition for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |