Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable, well-sequenced checklist with concrete commands and validation steps throughout. Its main gaps are the absence of an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop and a couple of inline templates that might be better factored into reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — commands, JSON/JS templates, and verification scripts with minimal conceptual padding — but the opening line restates the description and a few bridging sentences could be trimmed, keeping it just below the score-5 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Nearly every section supplies copy-paste-ready bash, JSON, and JavaScript (e.g. `python3 -c "import json; json.load(open('skills.json')); print('valid')"`, the git workflow block) covering the common cases, matching the fully-executable score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced checklist (Pre-flight → steps 1–6 → Verification → Git Workflow) with concrete validation checkpoints and a PASS/MISSING check, but it lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop within steps, so it does not reach the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent) and the skill is a single well-sectioned file; structure is good and navigation is easy, but the large inline JSON/JS templates could arguably live in reference files, so it sits just below the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |