Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a thorough, highly actionable orchestration skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, and well-organized one-level-deep template references. Its main weakness is conciseness, as several rules and the analysis-before-execution stance are restated repeatedly.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'analysis before execution / do not jump to experiments' guidance into a single authoritative statement to reduce length without losing the rule.
De-duplicate the non-negotiable rules against the later workflow sections so each constraint appears once, with the workflow referencing it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and free of general-knowledge padding, but the 'analysis before execution' theme and several non-negotiable rules are restated multiple times and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: stable id format (R1-C1), explicit route enums, exact artifact paths, named tool calls (artifact.record_analysis_slice, memory.list_recent(scope='quest', limit=5)), and a required field list for experimental items; as an instruction-only skill, absence of executable code is not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops after each slice and before finalizing (e.g., 'Do not finalize... while reviewer-critical rows remain unresolved without an explicit blocker note'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Reusable scaffolds are split into well-signaled, one-level-deep template files in references/ (review-matrix, action-plan, response-letter, evidence-update), all of which exist on disk; navigation is explicit. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |