Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted orientation skill: lean tables replace prose, code is concrete, the phase structure ends in a genuine validation checklist, and routing to downstream skills is decisive. The remaining gaps are small — unimported coroutine helpers in the code samples and a modest amount of trimming available in the Phase 0 intent section.
Suggestions
State the dependency for the await* helpers (e.g., a one-line note that `awaitOfferings()`/`awaitCustomerInfo()` come from the purchases-ktx Kotlin extensions) so the code samples are self-contained.
Tighten Phase 0 by merging the start/skip bullets, which largely restate the frontmatter description, into a single trigger/skip line.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and information-bearing — tables for the raw-stack mapping, the four concepts, tradeoffs, and routing, with short code snippets. It explains RevenueCat-specific knowledge Claude does not have (e.g., `isActive` resolving the seven Play states server-side) rather than padding. Minor trimmable spots remain: Phase 0's start/skip guidance repeats what the description already establishes, and "If the user's goal does not match any row, stay here" could be one clause shorter — that keeps it below the lean-every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, runnable Kotlin for the two core reads (`awaitOfferings()`, `awaitCustomerInfo()` with `entitlements["pro_access"]?.isActive`) and for `Purchases.configure(...)` with the builder, plus a decisive goal→skill routing table. Not a 5 due to small gaps: no imports or dependency declarations for the `await*` extension functions, and the code samples are not framed as copy-paste-complete files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four phases (Intent → Orient → Map → Sanity check) are clearly sequenced, and Phase 3 is an explicit four-point checklist with a failure recovery loop ("If any of the four fail, reread Phase 1 or the chapter before proceeding"). This matches the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation steps and checklists; this is a read-only orientation skill, so no destructive-operation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and the body is well-organized into clearly headed phases with a single, well-signaled one-level reference (the external full-chapter link). Content is appropriately inlined for a compact orientation skill. Not a 5 because at ~125 lines some detail (e.g., the seven Play subscription states or the mitigation comparison) could live in a reference file, and the routing table references sibling skills whose existence cannot be verified from this bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |