Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary actionability and workflow document: executable tool calls, a working encoding script, correct/wrong examples, and guarded fallbacks for a read-only flow. Its weaknesses are a ~340-line monolithic layout whose field/value reference tables belong in a separate one-level-deep file, and some repeated guidance across sections that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Move the Fields tables, Value formats, and Encoding-the-rule sections into a references/ file (e.g. references/fields.md), keeping SKILL.md as an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Deduplicate the "Dashboard URL for this result" guidance — state the preference once and have the link-construction section reference it rather than repeat it in three places.
Trim step 6 (totalRenewals filter-only rule) into the sort_by field list or the fields table where it is also implied, to reduce overlap between the numbered workflow and later sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and competence-assuming: no concept filler, terse field tables, correct/wrong URL examples instead of prose explanation. Not 5 because the "Dashboard URL for this result" guidance repeats across three sections and steps 6–7 partially restate the later sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: exact tool calls with parameters (`get-audience-filter-options` with `project_id`/`fields`, `preview-audience` with `body.rules` or `audience_uuid`), a copy-paste Python URL-encoding script, exact URL shapes, correct/wrong encodings, and two worked examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both workflows are numbered with explicit checkpoints and fallbacks: fetch valid project-specific values before building rules, prefer the tool-provided "Dashboard URL" line, and "If the response has no `customer_list_id`, link to `/customer-lists` and name the audience rather than guessing". All operations are read-only ("It is read-only and saves nothing"), so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure and working internal anchors, but the skill is a single ~340-line file with no references/ bundle: the field tables, value formats, and encoding details form a large inline API reference that would fit a one-level-deep reference file. Not 4 because the bulk reference material is inlined rather than appropriately split; not 2 because it is well-sectioned and navigable, not a header-less wall of text. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |