Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, high-signal overview: excellent shared-concepts bullets, concrete platform detection, and a real verification checklist. Its critical flaw is that all five referenced platform files are missing from the bundle, which undercuts both actionability and progressive disclosure since the actual implementation guidance is unreachable.
Suggestions
Ship the five platforms/*.md files referenced in sections 1 and 3 (ios, android, kmp, flutter, react-native) so the promised logIn/logOut wiring examples are actually reachable, or inline a minimal logIn/logOut snippet per platform in SKILL.md.
Add brief error-recovery guidance to the Verify section for what to check when a verification fails (e.g., appUserID mismatch in the dashboard, or a lost anonymous purchase after logIn), turning the checklist into a feedback loop.
State the expected location or packaging of the platforms/ directory in the bundle so a reader can confirm where the referenced files live.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~46-line body is lean with zero padding: no explanation of what RevenueCat or auth systems are, and every bullet conveys a non-obvious SDK behavior (anonymous-ID aliasing, logOut throwing on anonymous IDs, restore vs login) that Claude cannot be assumed to know. Not the level below (4) because there is no over-explanation to trim at all. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete API names, call ordering, error codes (PurchasesErrorCode.LogOutWithAnonymousUserError) and platform-detection criteria are present, but the promised executable wiring — "Each platform file shows the logIn and logOut calls wired into a typical auth state observer" — lives in platforms/*.md files that are absent from the bundle, leaving key implementation details missing. Not 4 because the gap is not minor: the entire implementation layer is unreachable. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (detect platform → shared concepts → implement → verify) with an explicit 4-item verification checklist including dashboard-level checks. Not 5 because there is no error-recovery guidance for what to do when a verification step fails (e.g., the appUserID mismatching). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well-signaled with one-level-deep references, but every referenced path (platforms/ios.md, platforms/android.md, platforms/kmp.md, platforms/flutter.md, platforms/react-native.md) is missing from the bundle, so the disclosure structure is broken at its core — following the references fails entirely. Not 3 because references being absent is a more severe defect than references being present but poorly signaled. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |