Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable body that gives exact API parameters, output shapes, gotchas, and a clear multi-step workflow with error-recovery checkpoints. The main weaknesses are minor redundancy (a duplicated date-range rule and a general subscription-business preamble) and the absence of any external reference files for the sizable dashboard-URL and metric sections.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate inclusive-date-range instruction (it appears both in the get-chart-data section and under Interpreting metrics); keep it in one place.
Trim or condense the "four forces" (acquisition/conversion/retention/reactivation) preamble, which restates general subscription knowledge Claude already has, and lead directly with the RevenueCat chart guidance.
Consider extracting the dashboard-URL format and metric-interpretation sections into reference files (e.g. dashboard-links.md, metrics.md) linked from a concise overview, to improve progressive disclosure and reduce SKILL.md length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly high-signal API mechanics Claude does not already know, but the inclusive "last N days" date rule is duplicated (in the get-chart-data section and again under Interpreting metrics) and the "four forces" preamble states general subscription-business concepts; it is not score 3 because not every token earns its place, and not score 1 because it avoids broad concept explanations. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact tool names, literal JSON filter/selector payloads (e.g. the App Store US/UK filter example), resolution-ID tables, and complete URL templates with correct-vs-WRONG examples — copy-paste ready; not score 2 because guidance is concrete and complete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences the query workflow (schema → data → analyze) and a numbered 0–7 link-building checklist, with feedback loops such as re-reading the options schema on a 400 parameter_error and requiring a verified prior get-chart-data call before building a link; not score 2 because validation checkpoints are explicit, not implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized with working internal anchors, but everything lives in one ~330-line SKILL.md with no external reference files, and the dashboard-URL and metric-interpretation material could plausibly be split out; not score 3 because content is not split across one-level-deep references, and not score 1 because organization is good rather than a monolithic wall of text. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |