Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and self-contained with genuinely Figma-specific guidance, but it pads bullets with rationales Claude already knows and stays descriptive rather than providing executable procedures or a sequenced workflow. It works as a reference but underperforms on conciseness and actionability.
Suggestions
Trim explanatory rationales from each bullet (e.g. drop '; it ensures consistent spacing, responsive resizing...' and the Atomic Design definition) and keep only Figma-specific guidance Claude would not already know.
Add a minimal sequenced workflow with checkpoints for at least one fragile operation, e.g. building a component -> validating variant coverage -> publishing, so multi-step work has explicit validation.
For the Plugin API technique, include one short executable code snippet (e.g. a token-export or batch-rename snippet) instead of only naming the tasks, raising actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean bullet points, but nearly every principle and pitfall carries an explanatory rationale clause (e.g. '; it ensures consistent spacing, responsive resizing, and alignment with how CSS flexbox renders', 'variables enable theming and mode switching', and an Atomic Design definition) that explains concepts Claude already knows; it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance names concrete Figma specifics (variant panel with Size sm/md/lg and State default/hover/disabled, packed/space-between alignment) but offers no executable code or complete step-by-step procedure — the Plugin API technique lists tasks (batch-renaming, palette generation, token export) without any code example, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Content is well organized topically (Principles, Techniques, Patterns, Pitfalls) but presents no sequenced end-to-end workflow and no validation/verification checkpoints; this is a broad expertise skill rather than a single-task skill, so the simple-skill exception does not apply, placing it above the no-structure anchor but below the explicit-checkpoint anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, self-contained with no bundle files and no external references, and uses well-organized sections (Key Principles, Techniques, Common Patterns, Pitfalls to Avoid), which per the scoring notes lets progressive disclosure score 3 on section organization alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |