CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

helm

Helm chart expert for Kubernetes package management, templating, and dependency management

67

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./crates/openfang-skills/bundled/helm/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a dense, actionable Helm reference with real template syntax and commands, excellent token efficiency, and clean section organization; its only gap is the absence of an explicit development workflow with validation checkpoints.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and high-signal: terse bullets with concrete template syntax and commands, no basic-concept explanations (it assumes Claude knows Kubernetes/Go templating), and only a brief conventional persona intro, so nearly every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

It gives real, executable guidance — e.g. `{{- include "mychart.labels" . | nindent 4 }}`, `"helm.sh/hook": pre-install,pre-upgrade`, `checksum/config: {{ include (print $.Template.BasePath "/configmap.yaml") . | sha256sum }}`, and `helm upgrade --install -f values-prod.yaml` — with specific function names and copy-paste-ready snippets rather than pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The content is organized as principles/patterns rather than a sequenced multi-step workflow, and while validation-adjacent practices are mentioned (--atomic, ConfigMap checksum, templates/tests/), there is no explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint sequence for chart development.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

At under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the content is well split into clearly headed sections (Key Principles, Techniques, Common Patterns, Pitfalls to Avoid), which earns a 3 under the simple-skills note.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

72%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a distinct, well-targeted niche with strong natural trigger terms, but it relies on a role label and noun phrases rather than concrete actions and omits an explicit "Use when" trigger clause, capping completeness and specificity.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when creating, packaging, upgrading, or debugging Helm charts, or when the user mentions Helm, charts, values.yaml, or Kubernetes package management," to raise completeness from 2 to 3.

Replace the role/noun phrasing with concrete action verbs, e.g. "Create, package, template, and upgrade Helm charts; manage chart dependencies and Go template rendering," to lift specificity from 2 to 3.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names a concrete domain ("Helm chart", "Kubernetes") and three sub-areas ("package management, templating, and dependency management"), but frames them as nouns under "expert for" with no concrete action verbs, matching the anchor that names a domain and some actions without being comprehensive.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill covers but has no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance; per the judging guidelines a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

"Helm chart", "Kubernetes", "templating", and "dependency management" are exactly the natural terms a user would say when needing this skill, giving good coverage of common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Helm chart" for "Kubernetes package management" is a clear, specialized niche with distinct triggers that is unlikely to fire for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
RightNow-AI/openfang
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.