Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable set of 12 automated UX-review rules with concrete tooling, measurable thresholds, and clear implementation guidance. It is efficient and well-organized, with only minor room to tighten the Background section and consider offloading the rule catalog to a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Each of the 12 rules uses a compact Check/Automation-ideas/Fail-message format that earns its tokens; the Background & Scope section has minor padding that could be trimmed, matching the 4 anchor rather than a clean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Rules cite concrete tools (axe-core, Lighthouse, DOM/CSS parsers, NLP similarity) and measurable thresholds (>=80%, <=3 clicks, >20 rows, >90% similarity); as an instruction-only skill the guidance is actionable with minor gaps, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Implementation Guidance section sequences work (priority order, scoring scheme, tool-to-rule mapping, skip conditions); this is a review/reporting skill rather than a destructive or batch operation, so the validation cap does not apply, and it fits anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and no nested references (no bundle files present); structure is good and self-contained, though the ~116 lines of detailed rules could arguably be split into a reference file, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |