Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-structured standards reference that assumes competence and gives concrete API and naming rules. Its main weakness is the absence of illustrative code examples and a short worked example showing the rules applied together.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, bullet-driven, and assumes Claude's competence; only the LF-line-endings bullet carries slightly more enforcement detail than strictly needed, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance (specific APIs like "tryExec()", exact naming prefixes, "#pragma once", "SQLITECPP_ASSERT()"), with only minor gaps such as no illustrative code snippets. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-purpose standards reference it is clearly organized into labeled sections that act as a checklist; it is not a multi-step workflow, but the single action (apply these rules when editing) is unambiguous with only minor sequencing/checkpoint gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is organized into four well-labeled sections, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |