Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean reference skill: terse rule lists, a concrete format template, copy-paste build commands, and one-level-deep pointers to canonical repo files and sibling skills. Its only weakness is the absence of a verification step for the doc-generation workflow, which keeps workflow clarity at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and declarative throughout ('Public API must be documented in headers.', 'Keep @file, @ingroup, @brief.', 'Keep the full MIT license block in real file headers.') with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a complete copy-paste-ready format template, exact build commands ('cmake -DSQLITECPP_RUN_DOXYGEN=ON ..', 'cmake --build . --target SQLiteCpp_doxygen') with the output path, and exact canonical example file paths, fully covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The usage flow is clear (match the existing header, copy the canonical examples, apply the tag rules, run the documented build target), but there is no validation checkpoint such as confirming a warnings-free Doxygen build, leaving a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The short, well-sectioned body keeps rules inline and pushes detail to clearly signaled one-level-deep references ('include/SQLiteCpp/Database.h', 'src/Database.cpp', sibling skills 'sqlitecpp-coding-standards' and 'sqlitecpp-workflow'), with nothing inlined that belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |