Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, self-contained two-phase recipe with clear sequencing and an approval checkpoint, but its embedded prompts are redundant and its CLI invocations stop short of fully copy-paste-ready syntax.
Suggestions
Show one fully runnable example invocation (or the complete curl JSON payload) for each phase so the commands are copy-paste ready rather than described in prose.
Tighten the negative prompt by consolidating redundant negations into grouped categories to reduce token cost without losing coverage.
Add a brief failure-recovery note (e.g., what to do if generation errors or a poll times out) to strengthen the workflow's validation/feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely free of concept-explaining fluff and the 'Notes for the Executing Agent' are lean, but the embedded generation prompt and especially the negative prompt are highly redundant ('no outfit change, no costume change, no new clothes, no extra accessories, no glasses, no headphones, no makeup...'), so it fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete commands and models ('muapi image edit' model='nano-banana-2-edit', 'muapi video from-image'/'edit_video' model='kling-v2.6-std-motion-control') with full prompt text and a curl fallback, but the actual runnable CLI invocation form (flags/JSON payload) is implied rather than given verbatim, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases A and B are clearly sequenced with input-gathering gates and an explicit approval checkpoint ('Present the generated cartoon character to the user for approval') before proceeding, satisfying the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets are empty) and the recipe is self-contained with well-organized sections (Inputs, Steps, Trigger Keywords, Notes); per the simple-skills scoring note this warrants a 3 for clear organization without nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |