Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and concise, giving copy-paste-ready commands and prompts with a well-organized self-contained structure; its main gap is the absence of validation/verification checkpoints in the generation workflow.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step after generation (e.g. confirm the image matches the requested room_type/style before offering follow-ups) to introduce a feedback checkpoint.
Merge or rename the two separate 'Notes' sections to avoid the slight structural redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-dense — input table, concrete numbered steps with prompt templates and CLI commands — without explaining concepts Claude already knows; the only redundancy is a one-line bold duplication of the description. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable muapi commands with specific model IDs, complete prompt templates with {{input}} placeholders, aspect ratios, follow-up tool names, and an exact curl fallback — copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phase A is clearly sequenced with conditional edit-vs-generate logic, but there are no validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops, so it sits at 'steps listed but checkpoints missing'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the self-contained body is well-organized into clear sections (Inputs, Steps, Notes, Trigger Keywords), meeting the simple-skill allowance for a clean 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |