Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable, and concise recipe with a clear phased workflow and approval checkpoint, held back from 5s by missing exact CLI syntax, failure-recovery loops, and slight overage of the simple-skill line budget.
Suggestions
Add exact executable `muapi` command syntax (e.g. `muapi image generate --model nano-banana-2-edit --prompt "..." --aspect-ratio 4:5`) so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Include an explicit feedback loop for generation failures (e.g. retry on error, check `muapi predict result` status before proceeding) to reach workflow clarity 5.
Drop the redundant bold lead-in that repeats the frontmatter description verbatim to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor redundancy (the bold lead-in repeats the description verbatim) and light over-explanation in the notes, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete prompts with placeholders, named model IDs, aspect ratios, and a curl fallback, but omits exact `muapi` CLI flag syntax, leaving minor gaps that fit anchor 4 over 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-phase sequence with an explicit user-approval checkpoint before Phase B, but no error-recovery/feedback loop for generation failures, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained with well-organized sections and no nested or buried references; just over the 50-line simple-skill threshold, so it fits anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |