Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and presents a clear sequenced workflow with error-recovery and cost-gate checkpoints. Main improvements are trimming minor padding and adding an explicit output-verification step before returning assets.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after Layer B (e.g., confirm each animation asset has a valid URL/asset id before composing the return summary).
Remove the bold duplicate of the description line under the heading, or replace it with a one-line purpose statement that adds new information.
Consolidate the two "Notes" sections ("Notes" and "Notes for the Executing Agent") or rename one to avoid header overlap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the description line is repeated as a bold header and there are two "Notes" sections, giving minor instances that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete `muapi image generate`, `muapi audio create`, `muapi video from-image` commands with model IDs and parameters plus a complete curl fallback are mostly executable, though the main calls are not full copy-paste invocations. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-layer parallel sequence with an explicit Layer-A→Layer-B dependency, a failover-to-fallback feedback loop, and a 50-cr cost gate; the only gap is no explicit verification that each generated asset succeeded before returning. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained (no references/scripts/assets bundles), under ~50 lines, and well-organized into Inputs, Steps, Notes, Trigger Keywords, and Agent Notes sections with no nested references, qualifying for the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |